Congresses and Docs

Memorandum of Political Alternative, an updated version of 1.03.2019

Memorandum of Political Alternative

YABLOKO's Ten Key Programme Issues

THE DEMOCRATIC MANIFESTO

YABLOKO's Political Platform Adopted by the 15th Congress, June 21, 2008

The 18th Congress of YABLOKO

RUSSIA DEMANDS CHANGES! Electoral Program for 2011 Parliamentary Elections.

Key resolutions by the Congress:

On Stalinism and Bolshevism
Resolution. December 21, 2009

On Anti-Ecological Policies of Russia’s Authorities. Resolution of the 15th congress of the YABLOKO party No 253, December 24, 2009

On the Situation in the Northern Caucasus. Resolution of the 15th congress of the YABLOKO party No 252, December 24, 2009

YABLOKO's POLITICAL COMMITTEE DECISIONS:

YABLOKO’s Political Committee: Russian state acts like an irresponsible business corporation conducting anti-environmental policies

 

Overcoming bolshevism and stalinism as a key factor for Russia¦µ™s transformation in the 21st century

 

On Russia's Foreign Policies. Political Committee of hte YABLOKO party. Statement, June 26, 2009

 

On Iran’s Nuclear Problem Resolution by the Political Committee of the YABLOKO party. October 6, 2009

 

Anti-Crisis Proposals (Housing-Roads-Land) of the Russian United Democratic Party YABLOKO. Handed to President Medvedev by Sergei Mitrokhin on June 11, 2009

Brief Outline of Sergei Mitrokhin’s Report at the State Council meeting. January 22, 2010

 

Assessment of Russia’s Present Political System and the Principles of Its Development. Brief note for the State Council meeting (January 22, 2010) by Dr.Grigory Yavlinsky, member of YABLOKO’s Political Committee. January 22, 2010

 

Address of the YABLOKO party to President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev. Political Committee of the YABLOKO party. October 9, 2009

 

The 17th Congress of YABLOKO

 

 

 

The 16th Congress of Yabloko

Photo by Sergei Loktionov

The 12th congress of Yabloko


The 11th congress of Yabloko


The 10th congress of Yabloko

Moscow Yabloko
Yabloko for Students
St. Petersburg Yabloko
Khabarovsk Yabloko
Irkutsk Yabloko
Kaliningrad Yabloko(eng)
Novosibirsk Yabloko
Rostov Yabloko
Yekaterinburg Yabloko
(Sverdlovsk Region)

Krasnoyarsk Yabloko
Ulyanovsk Yabloko
Tomsk Yabloko
Tver Yabloko(eng)
Penza Yabloko
Stavropol Yabloko

Action of Support

Archives

Categories

SOON!

FOR YOUR INTEREST!

Programme by candidate for the post of Russian President Grigory Yavlinsky. Brief Overview

My Truth

Grigory Yavlinsky at Forum 2000, Prague, 2014

YABLOKO-ALDE conference 2014

Grigory Yavlinsky : “If you show the white feather, you will get fascism”

Grigory Yavlinsky: a coup is started by idealists and controlled by rascals

The Road to Good Governance

Risks of Transitions. The Russian Experience

Grigory Yavlinsky on the Russian coup of August 1991

A Male’s Face of Russia’s Politics

Black Sea Palaces of the New Russian Nomenklatura

Realeconomik

The Hidden Cause of the Great Recession (And How to Avert the Nest One)

by Dr. Grigory Yavlinsky

Resoulution
On the results of the Conference “Migration: International Experience and Russia’s Problems” conducted by the Russian United Democratic Party YABLOKO and the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (the ALDE party)

Moscow, April 6, 2013

International Conference "Youth under Threat of Extremism and Xenophobia. A Liberal Response"
conducted jointly by ELDR and YABLOKO. Moscow, April 21, 2012. Speeches, videos, presentations

What does the opposition want: to win or die heroically?
Moskovsky Komsomolets web-site, July 11, 2012. Interview with Grigory Yavlinsky by Yulia Kalinina.

Building a Liberal Europe - the ALDE Project

By Sir Graham Watson

Lies and legitimacy
The founder of the Yabloko Party analyses the political situation. Article by Grigory Yavlinsky on radio Svoboda. April 6, 2011

Algorithms for Opposing Gender Discrimination: the International and the Russian Experience

YABLOKO and ELDR joint conference

Moscow, March 12, 2011

Reform or Revolution

by Vladimir Kara-Murza

Is Modernisation in Russia Possible? Interview with Grigory Yavlinsky and Boris Titov by Yury Pronko, "The Real Time" programme, Radio Finam, May 12, 2010

Grigory Yavlinsky's interview to Vladimir Pozner. The First Channel, programme "Pozner", April 20, 2010 (video and transcript)

Overcoming the Totalitarian Past: Foreign Experience and Russian Problems by Galina Mikhaleva. Research Centre for the East European Studies, Bremen, February 2010.

Grigory Yavlinsky: Vote for the people you know, people you can turn for help. Grigory Yavlinsky’s interview to the Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper, October 8, 2009

Grigory Yavlinsky: no discords in the tandem. Grigory Yavlinsky’s interview to the Radio Liberty
www.svobodanews.ru
September 22, 2009

A Credit for Half a Century. Interview with Grigory Yavlinsky by Natalia Bekhtereva, Radio Russia, June 15, 2009

Sergei Mitrokhin's Speech at the meeting with US Preseident Barack Obama. Key Notes, Moscow, July 7, 2009

Mitrokhin proposed a visa-free regime between Russia and EU at the European liberal leaders meeting
June 18, 2009

Demodernization
by Grigory Yavlinsky

European Union chooses Grigory Yavlinsky!
Your vote counts!

Reforms that corrupted Russia
By Grigory Yavlinsky, Financial Times (UK), September 3, 2003

Grigory Yavlinsky: "It is impossible to create a real opposition in Russia today."
Moskovsky Komsomolets, September 2, 2003

Alexei Arbatov: What Should We Do About Chechnya?
Interview with Alexei Arbatov by Mikhail Falaleev
Komsomolskaya Pravda, November 9, 2002

Grigory Yavlinsky: Our State Does Not Need People
Novaya Gazeta,
No. 54, July 29, 2002

Grigory Yavlinsky: The Door to Europe is in Washington
Obschaya Gazeta, May 16, 2002

Grigory Yavlinsky's speech.
March 11, 2002

Grigory Yavlinsky's Lecture at the Nobel Institute
Oslo, May 30, 2000

IT IS IMPORTANT!

 

Yabloko: Liberals in Russia

By Alexander Shishlov, July 6, 2009

Position on Some Important Strategic Issues of Russian-American Relations

Moscow, July 7, 2009

The Embrace of Stalinism

By Arseny Roginsky, 16 December 2008

Nuclear Umbrellas and the Need for Understanding: IC Interview With Ambassador Lukin
September 25, 1997

Would the West’s Billions Pay Off?
Los Angeles Times
By Grigory Yavlinsky and Graham Allison
June 3, 1991

On the critical need for an immediate ceasefire

Decision by the Federal Political Committee of Yabloko, adopted on 21.11.2024, published on 27.11.2024

Photo: The Kursk region, August 2024 / Photo by Anatoly Zhdanov, Kommersant

Even before the start of the “special military operation”, the Yabloko party warned of the catastrophic consequences of a military conflict between Russia and Ukraine. From the very beginning of the hostilities, we proposed realistic ways to end them and expressed our readiness to act as organisers and participants in the negotiation process. In April 2022, we first formulated the demand for a ceasefire agreement as the first step towards resolving the conflict.

This call has not yet been accepted by either the parties to the conflict or world leaders. However, it has always found understanding and support from professional military specialists who clearly saw the futility of a forceful solution to the conflict. There were many opportunities to stop the war, but they were all missed. Each new stage of the conflict only worsened the situation increasing the number of victims and the scale of destruction.

 

In recent months, the tragedy has only intensified. Dozens of thousands of soldiers and hundreds of civilians, including children, have died on both sides. The Kursk region of Russia has become a combat zone, Ukraine’s territorial losses have increased, its economy, especially its energy sector, is being destroyed.

 

Meanwhile, in Russia, the military-industrial complex has completely absorbed the civilian economy. The entrepreneurial middle class and independent businesses are being destroyed. Russian society, especially in the regions, is experiencing a deep moral deformation: people agree to go to the front with all the ensuing consequences for multi-million rouble payments. Political repression has reached a scale unseen since Stalinism. Thousands of people have ended up behind bars for their anti-war stance, hundreds of thousands have been forced to leave the country.

 

As we warned, the West is cutting its aid to Ukraine due to the depletion of its own military resources and the fatigue of European nations from someone else’s war.

 

A change of administration in the United States can radically change the situation: the president-elect announced his intention to reduce the American presence in Europe, which can radically transform the balance of power and the further prospects of the conflict.

 

At the same time, the outgoing administration, following the leaders of France and Great Britain, approved long-range missile strikes deep into Russian territory. This dramatically increases the likelihood of using nuclear weapons with the prospect of the complete destruction of life on Earth.

 

On 19 November, 2024, Vladimir Putin signed a decree approving an updated nuclear doctrine, which assumes the possibility of responding to “aggression from any non-nuclear state with the participation or support of a nuclear state”.

 

By signing this document, he confirmed the principle according to which Russia can use nuclear weapons in response to aggression against itself or Belarus using conventional weapons. The Kremlin has already stated that Ukraine’s use of Western non-nuclear missiles against Russia can lead under the new doctrine to a nuclear response. This is another step towards a real nuclear apocalypse.

 

Therefore, we continue to categorically insist that the only real chance to stave off the growing likelihood of a nuclear war, save lives on both sides of the front, prevent further destruction of Ukraine, and create conditions for negotiations is an immediate ceasefire.

 

The first step could be to conclude an agreement to stop strikes deep into the territories of Russia and Ukraine (outside the agreed adjacent zone along the line of contact). Then to reach an agreement on a ceasefire on the line of contact and in the adjacent zone, on the withdrawal of troops, heavy weapons and military equipment at agreed distances, on the introduction of an observer contingent of neutral states. On this basis bilateral and multilateral negotiations on a comprehensive peaceful settlement of the conflict, on the limitation and reduction of armed forces and on confidence-building measures in Europe (Helsinki-2) can begin.

 

It is important to understand that the ceasefire agreement:

 

– DOES NOT fix the ownership of territories;

 

– DOES NOT establish interstate borders or demarcation lines;

 

– DOES NOT address the issue of joining or not joining NATO;

 

– DOES NOT require the cessation of military cooperation with third countries;

 

– DOES NOT establish neutrality or turn anyone into a satellite state;

 

– DOES NOT lift sanctions against anyone;

 

– DOES NOT hinder the investigation of war crimes.

 

This agreement is aimed solely at ceasing the bloodshed and saving human lives. In the current circumstances, the path to justice is to save human lives and stop the tragic destruction of the future. All other issues must be discussed in negotiations, which will only be possible after the ceasefire.

 

Today, the idea of ​​a ceasefire has gone beyond narrow circles and is gaining increasing support. It is shared not only by the world’s leading intellectuals and Nobel Prize laureates, but also by a number of states. Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Bulgaria, and Serbia are in favour of ending the hostilities. Countries such as Brazil, India, China, Turkey, and others are ready to contribute to this. As sociological surveys show, the majority of citizens of Russia and Ukraine also want a ceasefire.

 

We once again appeal to politicians who make key decisions, especially Vladimir Putin, as well as political leaders in Kyiv, Washington, and Brussels, to reach an agreement on a ceasefire.

 

We also ask all responsible citizens, and especially opinion leaders in different fields, to support our demands. Whether the idea of ​​a ceasefire becomes dominant in the public consciousness will determine when it will become a reality.

 

A ceasefire is not only a moral necessity, but also the only real path to peace and a future.

 

The Federal Political Committee of the Yabloko Party once again calls for a ceasefire.

 

We demand that leaders demonstrate the political will needed for a peaceful resolution of the ongoing crisis threatening a global catastrophe.

 

Every day of delay brings new victims, growing bitterness, fear and dehumanisation in society. The growing escalation of the conflict brings the possible outbreak of World War III closer.

 

We emphasise once again: only a ceasefire stops the killing of people and the slide towards a nuclear catastrophe, only this gives hope for the future.

 

We appeal to the Presidents of Russia and Ukraine with a demand to conclude a ceasefire agreement. We call on the heads of the leading countries of the world to support the conclusion of a ceasefire agreement between Russia and Ukraine.

 

We appeal to the citizens of Russia to support this call.

 

Continuation of military actions and further escalation of the conflict is the path to World War III.

 

Grigory Yavlinsky,

Chairman of the Yabloko Federal Political Committee

 

The Federal Political Committee decisions calling to a ceasefire:

On the critical need to reach a ceasefire as soon as possible” decision of 20 October 2022

A ceasefire is the first and inevitable step towards peace” decision of 24 March, 2023

On the urgent need of a ceasefire” decision of 24 November, 2023