2.3. Regional approach
Economic
prerequisites
[previous] [CONTENTS]
[next]
Economic reasons are the most important
factors of
integration, and using them one can keep track of the
probable behavior in the given majority of the regions.
One
can cite two different reasons: Existing imbalance in
economic development of the regions and the existence among
many republics of certain advantages -- their own sort of
"economic trump card."
Inequality in the development among the
different regions of
Russia, being naturally tied to natural resources, to a
definite extent is the result of the forced territorial
distribution of labor in the period of socialist
industrialization. The unity of this system, based on a
tight centralized interregional redistribution of resources
and production, must unavoidably collapse with the transfer
to market horizontal ties and with the changes in geography
and the state of the Russian market.
The development of this process will lead
to a change in
appearance of the "highly developed" regions,
and within a
certain period of time, providing that the economy adapts
to
new conditions, it will turn the majority of the regions
into depressed conditions.
The leadership of many of Russia's regions
consider that the
center inhibits greatly their use of their own "economic
trumps," thanks to which the region will "live
better."
These comprise such things as a qualified work force, the
development of agriculture, powerful
diversification in
industrial production potential, a monopoly in an export
or
product in short supply, the existence of unique production
facilities and enterprise monopolists, and profitable
economic location (on borders, on seas and along main
transportation channels).
The desire for sole possession of these
"trumps" is
creating a powerful potential for the isolation of regions.
True, it is gradually becoming clearer that each of those
advantages is only significantly manifested in combination
with other regions and can be realized only in a
sufficiently robust market.
To a great extent the desire for exclusivity
is inherent in
those regions holding natural resources, which have in the
next 5 to 10 years a unique chance to create the foundation
for long-term stable development. For the exhaustion of
resources, the adaptation of the economic structures of
other regions, the lowering of the material and energy
capacity of the final products, and the increase in quality
and competition of similar products in the world market
from
other regions with such natural resources, will all result
in the reduction of the isolated regions' advantage. If
in
that time those regions do not create conditions for the
diversification of their economy, then they may very will
return once again to the club of depressed states.
There is yet one more group of regions that
is interested in
the decentralization of power. That is the border and sea
states which are trying to turn into free economic zones
with the plan of eventually joining highly developed
nations. However a rise in the economic strength of all
the
regions of the country is in their interests as well,
because all of their advantages will come to nothing should
there occur a general decline in the economy.
And finally, there are the agricultural
regions which see
that their interests lie in the protection and
improvement of the capacity of the domestic market as
economic leadership decentralizes.
Those regions with developed manufacturing
sectors have the
most potential to work for integration. The very existence
of those regions that manufacture final products and that
specialize in scientific technologies depends on the
development of economic interdependence among different
regions. The saturation of these regions with defense
production facilities suggests their objective orientation
(at least until military conversion occurs) toward the
center. These regions in coming years will be most tightly
tied to center-oriented efforts. Should the center not be
able to execute economic policies in the regional interests
and create initiatives for the restoration of technologies
and the greater competitiveness of the products produced
by
enterprises, then it will be these kinds of groups that
act
as the "seed crystal," taking upon themselves
the
unification function.
Finally, in Russia there have always been
and will continue
to be in the foreseeable future those regions that not only
lack significant economic advantages, but simply are
unfortunate in their natural and economic conditions (e.g.,
Kalmykia, the Dolgano-Nenets and Evenky autonomous areas
and
the Korsky Republic). Likewise there exist regions that
are
facing strong demographic pressures (e.g., the republics
of
the North Caucasus). These regions, by the directions of
their economic interests, will always depend either upon
the
center or on currently forming interregional "seed
crystals", and are interested in the availability of
economic mechanisms for their support.
[up]
[previous] [CONTENTS]
[next]
|