4.3.FINANCES
4.3.5
Support for the Solvency of Enterprises
How enterprises can be
helped.
[previous] [CONTENTS]
[next]
Regional authorities do not have great resources
at their
disposal to normalise settlements and solvency. However
their
efforts in this area may reduce the degree of "economic
tension" building up in enterprises and prevent social
crises.
Firstly they can provide information. The
region's economic
department should compile a list of the most influential
enterprises in the region. Statistics should be gathered
at
least once a month on these enterprises via the Central
Bank of
Russia or via the enterprises' economic planning departments.
These statistics should be used to analyse the creditworthiness
of the enterprises and their degree of "impending insolvency".
The region should be read to provide provisional financial
aid
to these enterprises via deferred tax remissions to the
local
budget or the provision of low-interest credits, etc. Should
such aid be unavailable or seem futile, the region's employment
agencies should prepare themselves for potent ial production
shutdown and elaborate, in conjunction with the enterprises
concerned, a retraining strategy and worker's social support
programme.
Secondly the enterprises are extremely short
of financial
resources. Banks charge very high credit interest rates
beyond
the means of the enterprises. The region could promote the
following processes with resources accrued from its taxation
policy (via a share of tax receipts remitted to the local
budget) and also other resources (official support and
recommendations, the provision of premises, financial means,
etc.):
1. Replenishment of working capital. The
local soviet could
adopt a decision on preferential taxation on enterprise
profits, to enable it to replenish its working capital.
Given
the current high credit interest rates, this policy could
become an efficient lever for profit utilisation and
significantly enhance the soundness of the biggest enterprises.
Such a policy has been adopted in Belorussia.
2. Circulation of bills. A legislative base
exists (the law on
circulation of bills was adopted back in 1991) to replace
illegal credits between enterprises in the guise of default
payments with legal forms of commercial credit (bills).
Enterp
rises would be able to use on a wider basis this type of
settlement measure, if the region implemented several measures
to stimulate the circulation of bills.
Above all, a sufficiently reliable guarantee
(surety) is needed
for the bills, on a par with the enterprise which has issued
the bill. The biggest commercial banks and other authoritative
and reliable enterprises could act as guarantors. The
guarantees could be backed by an enterprise's assets (as
a
rule, assets which can easily be sold will be used). However,
the biggest pledge transactions may only be carried out
by
state-owned enterprises, with the prior authorisation of
the
owner, i.e., the regional state property fund. The number
of
such pledge transactions could be expanded.
Consequently settlements would be accelerated:
if they were not
carried out, the state property would be promptly
redistributed, sold off at auctions, etc. This might well
turn
out to be one of the best ways of promoting genuine
privatisation.
3. Clearing settlements. In recent times,
attempts have been
made to set up regional clearing chambers. We believe that
enterprises may well adopt clearing for mutual settlements
to
economise their working capital.
As a rule, however, most clearing settlement
proposals are
regional in nature and may therefore only affect regions
with
major internal product rotation. If a region specialises
in
agriculture, mining or processing and is not party to a
number
of sectors, (as is the case for most regions in the former
USSR) clearing will only have a very limited effect and
may
even technically complicate and slow down settlements.
Another approach offers more promise: the
region could help the
biggest enterprises, linked by mutual deliveries and
settlements, to set up clearing chambers. In this case,
settlements on a clearing basis would be far more effective
and
could lead to an a ppreciable saving of working capital.
Enterprises incorporated in the clearing system, which account
for a significant percentage of total mutual settlements,
should serve as the basis for clearing procedures, rather
than
enterprises linked only by their regional affiliation. In
addition a special commercial enterprise does not need to
be
set up as a clearing chamber: one of the biggest banks could
fulfil this role.
Although regions may only have a small influence
on the
solvency of the biggest enterprises, these measures would
still
have an appreciable effect.
[up]
[previous] [CONTENTS]
[next]
|