When the State Duma reconvenes after the May holidays,
one of the main items on its agenda will be the appointment of a
new ombudsman, and the incumbent ombudsman, Oleg Mironov, is running
neck-and-neck with former Justice Minister Pavel Krasheninnikov
for election.
Deputy Duma Speaker Irina Khakamada said last week that the appointment
of Krasheninnikov, a Union of Right Forces deputy and head of
the Duma's legislation committee, is all but fact.
"Krasheninnikov is simply tired of working in the Duma,"
Khakamada, who co-chairs the Union of Right Forces, or SPS, was
quoted by Gazeta as saying. "He wanted to either return to
the executive branch or become the human rights commissioner.
His confirmation for the ombudsman's post by the Duma has practically
been decided. We will miss him."
The ombudsman cannot have any political affiliations.
The official Rossiiskaya Gazeta reported last month that the
pro-Kremlin factions -- United Russia and People's Deputy -- had
decided to support Krasheninnikov, 39, who served as justice minister
in the cabinets of Sergei Kiriyenko, Yevgeny Primakov and Sergei
Stepashin.
A Duma source said Tuesday that Krasheninnikov appears to be
the Kremlin's choice and, with pro-Kremlin factions and SPS voting
for him, his chances of winning the 300 votes needed for nomination
and the 226 needed for confirmation are high.
Mironov's five-year term expires on May 22. The ombudsman receives
complaints and petitions and lobbies the government over human
rights.
Liberal politicians and the human rights community, which was
upset about the departure of the previous and first ombudsman,
former dissident Sergei Kovalyov, initially heaped criticism on
the appointment of Mironov, 63, a law professor who was a Communist
deputy at the time of his election in 1998.
Eventually, however, human rights activists changed their minds
about Mironov, saying he was eager to learn on the job. They now
are throwing their support behind his bid for reelection over
Krasheninnikov, whom they see as a pro-Kremlin figure.
In recent weeks Mironov and Krasheninnikov have met with members
of the Duma factions and human rights community to campaign for
the post.
A Yabloko source said Tuesday that the party was likely to vote
for Mironov. As a former Communist, Mironov also is certain to
win the support of his former colleagues.
Lyudmila Alexeyeva, head of the Moscow Helsinki Group human rights
organization, described reports about Krasheninnikov's certain
election as hype and said she would prefer to work with Mironov.
"During these five years he has learned to perform these
functions well," Alexeyeva said by telephone Tuesday. "I
don't see another person to fill this position now. Whoever is
appointed will have to begin learning from square one, and I am
afraid that, as in Mironov's case, it will take about half of
the term to do that."
Alexeyeva said Krasheninnikov met with several leading human
rights activists in her office last month and they had expressed
their disappointment with his support of the law on extremism
and opposition to alternative military service.
She said Kremlin officials had consulted her about the election
and she had voiced her support for Mironov.
Mironov said Tuesday that he was "calm" about the upcoming
vote but hinted he was displeased with widespread media reports
that Krasheninnikov would be picked.
"I live in the same house as Krasheninnikov, and I told
him, 'It's normal that you are claiming my post, but let's observe
legal and ethical norms,'" Mironov said by telephone. "My
term expires on May 22, and I plan to serve it out. I won't criticize
a single candidate for the job, and there will probably be about
10 of them."
Krasheninnikov could not be reached for comment Tuesday.
During his tenure, Mironov has built the post of human rights
commissioner into an institution. Besides its Moscow office, it
has offices with commissioners in 22 of the country's 89 regions.
It was not clear Tuesday when the Duma vote would take place.
Under the law, a decision must be reached within 30 days of the
expiration of the previous term.
See also:
the original at:
http://www.themoscowtimes.com
|