A controversial former chief judge of the Constitutional Court, who quit in
1993 after unsuccessfully opposing President Boris Yeltsin in his violent
stand-off with rebellious lawmakers, was elected to the post once again on
Friday.
In a surprising decision, 10 of the court's 19 judges cast their ballots
for Valery Zorkin, who served as the court's first chairman for nearly two
years after its creation in October 1991 and has remained a judge on the
court ever since. Zorkin, 60, replaces Marat Baglai, whose second
three-year term had come to an end, forcing the vote. Baglai got the nine
other votes.
The mild-mannered but fiery-eyed Zorkin, whose professional qualities won
praise from across the political spectrum, took the decision in stride,
saying it came as something of a surprise.
"I hope this isn't perceived as the advent of a person who fought for this
job. This happened by chance," Zorkin told the Kommersant newspaper. "The
Constitutional Court is a truly collective body with 19 equal judges."
Nearly a decade ago, Zorkin stepped down from his post as court chairman on
Oct. 6, 1993 -- two days after troops loyal to Yeltsin opened fire on the
parliament building where the president's armed opponents had been holed up
for several days -- saying he could not stay on "under the current
circumstances."
In the months leading up to the bloody stand-off, as the conflict between
Yeltsin and conservative lawmakers escalated, Zorkin had tried repeatedly
to mediate between the president and parliament, headed at the time by
Speaker Ruslan Khasbulatov.
As attempts at reconciliation failed, Yeltsin issued his infamous decree
No. 1400, disbanding the Supreme Soviet and calling for new parliamentary
elections. On Sept. 21, 1993, the Constitutional Court, with Zorkin
presiding, declared the decree unconstitutional and said it gave legal
grounds for stripping Yeltsin of his powers.
The ruling immediately became a battle cry for Yeltsin's foes, including
Khasbulatov and Vice President Alexander Rutskoi.
Two weeks later, with more than 100 dead, the president prevailed.
Zorkin's first stint as court chairman came at a time when Russia was
trying to redefine itself -- a time when legal and political changes were
intimately intertwined -- and his critics, including Yeltsin, scorned him
for getting too involved in politics.
Before he became court chairman, during the coup d'etat against Mikhail
Gorbachev in August 1991, Zorkin joined a group of legal experts in
condemning the revolt as unconstitutional. More than a year later, in
November 1992, the Constitutional Court stymied Yeltsin's attempts to
disband local Communist Party cells and to confiscate the party's property.
Now, Zorkin says, the court is resolute about keeping its nose out of
politics, as it has since 1994.
"This will be the court's unwavering line. Nobody should bother hoping that
we can be pulled to the left or the right or to the political center. We
are in the legal center," Zorkin said in an interview with Rossiiskaya
Gazeta.
"History never repeats itself," he told Kommersant. "Sound-minded people
must learn their lessons from those events [of 1993]. If they don't, they
should quietly leave the scene and write memoirs. I don't intend to write
any memoirs; I'm a working judge."
Legal experts and politicians of all stripes welcomed Zorkin's appointment.
"I personally hope that under its new chairman the Constitutional Court
will be more independent," State Duma Deputy Vladimir Lukin of the liberal
Yabloko party told Interfax. "[These hopes] significantly outweigh any
fears that Mr. Zorkin will display the overly strong political prejudices
that he showed in the early 1990s."
Communist leader Gennady Zyuganov praised Zorkin as "honest, courageous and
a man of dignity."
"The choice is perfectly understandable. No one doubts his professional
qualities," Sergei Vitsin, who authored some of the first post-perestroika
legal reforms under Yeltsin and now serves as deputy chairman of the
presidential advisory council on improving the court system, said in phone
interview Friday.
Zorkin said there may be some small changes to the court's work, but there
would be no revolutions.
Asked whether he believed changes should be made to the Constitution,
Zorkin replied: "If you don't learn to live by one Constitution, you will
never learn. Although, perhaps, there are certain things in our
Constitution that need greater balancing, but that is an issue of political
expediency."
While most observers saw Zorkin's election as a "natural rotation,"
especially considering that Baglai had managed to ruffle plenty of feathers
in the judicial community, Kommersant interpreted the appointment as a
signal that the court wants to free itself from Kremlin pressure.
"Over the course of Marat Baglai's chairmanship the Constitutional Court
did not make a single decision unsuitable for the Kremlin," the paper said
Saturday. "By electing Valery Zorkin the judges have shown that they want
greater independence from the Kremlin ... and the presidential
administration will have to take that into account."
One test of that thesis could come as early as this spring, the paper said,
when the court is due to consider a Communist challenge to a recently
passed law banning nationwide referendums in the year preceding
parliamentary or presidential elections.
|