REALITY: SAME DISEASE,
DIFFERENT SYMPTOMS
(What was the reaction of the
economy to the economic policy and are there any signs of
improvement?)
The government's moves over
the past six months have resulted in what may at first sight
appear as a paradoxical imbalance. Whereas final demand
fell by half (retail turnover fell 50% during the 1st quarter
of 1992 against the same period in 1991), production only
fell 13%. How could this happen? Why didn't the plunging
final demand send shockwaves all through the economy? What
prevented it?
Products were produced, but
there was no demand for them. Why didn't production fall
as it was naturally expected to? The inflationary "overhang"
was almost fully eliminated when prices shot up and enterprises
had no excess of money. The usual sources of funds - budget
deficit and credit expansion - were, of course, subject
to tougher controls than before and the products could not
be paid for at their expense.
|