[home page][map of the server][news of the server][forums][publications][Yabloko's Views]
Gazeta, October 2, 2002

The State Duma Analyses the Strategic Reductions Treaty

by Ivan Yegorov, Vitaly Mikhailov and Anastasia Matveyeva

    Boris Nemtsov, leader of the Union of Right-Wing Forces (SPS), proposes that all democratic forces agree to back one candidate for president after the parliamentary election in 2003. The formula is simple. Each party nominates its own candidate. The Duma election shows who has won. All democratic forces support the candidate whose party gathered the most votes, Russia and the USA have launched the ratification of the Treaty on Strategic Arms Reductions, which was signed in an attempt to fill in the vacuum left by the US withdrawal from the 1972 ABM Treaty and refusal to ratify START-2. Hearings in Russia and the USA are being held behind closed doors, but this newspaper has learned some details of the recent State Duma hearing.

On October 1 Deputy Foreign Minister Georgy Mamedov, deputy chief of the General Staff Colonel-General Yuri Baluyevsky and head of the nuclear munitions department of the Nuclear Energy Ministry Nikolai Voloshin informed deputies at the closed sitting of the Duma defence and international affairs committee about the Russian leaders' attitude to ratification. "The Strategic Reductions Treaty can be seen as a new treaty of friendship and cooperation between Russia and the USA," said Mamedov. He said the US Senate had held four hearings on the treaty and the attitude of most Senators was positive.

At the same time, Mamedov pointed out that we would most probably "need to adopt provisos to the treaty but provisos that would not kill the treaty or distort its essence." In particular, one such proviso could stipulate the liquidation of the amount of warheads mentioned in the lower reduction ceiling [Ed. the treaty provides for the liquidation of 1,700-2,200 warheads]. Another proviso might stipulate an extension to the treaty for reductions in warheads on its expiry (Ed. the treaty will expire on December 31, 2012) This means that if the USA does not liquidate something by this time, it would be able to unilaterally refuse to do so after the expiry of the treaty)

First Deputy Chief of the General Staff Colonel-General Yuri Baluyevsky assured the deputies that the treaty would not disrupt Russia-US strategic stability. "We abandoned the principle of quantity in favour of the principle of quality long ago," stated the deputy chief of the General Staff. He believes that "there is no need at all to have so many warheads which could destroy the USA several times over. The main issue concerns the quality of the warheads. Consequently the quantitative reduction in the nuclear arsenal will not affect national security." Nikolai Voloshin of the Ministry of Nuclear Power added that the national nuclear industry can ensure treaty implementation and has enough facilities to utilise scrapped warheads.

The next stage of ratification provides for a closed sitting of Duma committees where deputies will discuss the military- technical and the military-political aspects of the treaty. The committees on defence, industries and energy will discuss the military-technical aspect, while the committee on international affairs, defence and security will deal with the military- political aspect.

This will be followed by closed parliamentary hearings and the submission of the document to the State Duma for ratification in mid-October.

Alexei Arbatov and Andrei Nikolayev expressed the general opinion of State Duma deputies about the treaty ratification:"The treaty is not quite what we wanted but it is the best we could have at that moment." But Duma vice-speaker Vladimir Zhirinovsky was negative about the treaty as "they are reducing their weapons, whereas we are liquidating them." On the other hand, Zhirinovsky believes that there have been technological advances and that the importance of weapons slated for scrapping will soon pale before the power of new weapons. "The ice breakage could be part of a meteorolgical weapon of the future. We could raise the temperature two degeees insome places and this would plunge a whole continent under water at some other place, like the ferry off Senegal," he said.

The deputy speaker believes that the treaty would not be ratified before spring, as this should be done simultaneously with the US Congress, which "will be busy with elections and the war against Iraq until then."

The strategic offensive forces of Russia include all elements of the classical triad of the nuclear-missile forces, namely ICBMs, SLBMs and long-range air-launched cruise missiles, as well as their delivery vehicles. In all, Russia has 824 delivery vehicles for strategic offensive weapons, meaning launchers with 1,682 missiles carrying 5,518 nuclear 1-Kt to 1.2-Mt yield warheads, with aggregate throw weight of at least 3,600 Mt.

The strategic offensive forces of the USA have 5,949 nuclear warheads with the aggregate throw weight of over 2,000 Mt mounted on 551 ground-based silo-launched ballistic missiles (Minuteman-3 and Peacekeeper), 432 Trident missiles on 18 Ohio-class submarines and the cruise missiles mounted on 254 B-52 and B-2 heavy bombers.

See also:
Arms Control

Gazeta, October 2, 2002

[home page][map of the server][new items ][forum][publications][Yabloko's Views]

english@yabloko.ru