[main page][map of the server][news of the server][forums][guestbook][publications][hot issues]
By Olga Tropkina

Scandal intensifying Yabloko

Nezavisimaya Gazeta, September 12, 2001, p. 2

The autumn political season has begun with a scandal in the Yabloko movement. The scandal was preceded by protracted opposition between Yabloko leader Grigory Yavlinsky and former deputy leader Vyacheslav Igrunov. The other day another figure joined this argument: Andrei Sharomov, former chairman of the Moscow Youth Organization of Yabloko. He accused Yavlinsky of authoritarianism and the instigation of conflicts within the party "by Stalinist methods." Sharomov believes that other members of Yabloko support him. However, Yavlinsky's former deputy Igrunov, who was the cause of the conflict, had kept silent until September 11. In an exclusive interview with "Nezavisimaya Gazeta" Igrunov explained that he did not intend to sit idle.

According to Igrunov, as soon as Yavlinsky returned from his vacation, "the bacchanalia and sordid witch-hunt resumed in the party." Igrunov noted that Yabloko members had again started collecting signatures for some petitions and that anonymous letters had started circulating. In his opinion, Sergei Mitrokhin, member of the bureau of the central Council of Yabloko, had been pressured to force all paid staff at Yablokoto sign the letter against Igrunov. Therefore, Igrunov intends to resign from all positions in the Yabloko on October 10.

Our correspondent asked Igrunov why he had decided to deprive himself of the last levers of influencing the leader of Yabloko and give up any attempts to improve the situation in the movement. Igrunov answered, "It is just necessary to step aside."

Igrunov's passivity may be attributable to the forthcoming election to the Moscow City Duma. This election may become a combat between Yavlinsky and Igrunov, who is currently head of the Moscow branch of Yabloko. Yavlinsky intends to demonstrate through this election that Igrunov is incompetent, as only one person is likely to be elected to the Moscow State Duma at best due to Yavlinsky’s efforts. According to Igrunov, the Moscow branch is not funded now and has to seek its own financial resources. He noted that if this situation continued, there would be an exodus of the best people from the party. He believes that people are leaving the party already, and that not a single worthy person had joined over the past few months.

Sergei Mitrokhin, representative of Yavlinsky's "camp," has announced, in turn, that the behaviour of the leader of the Moscow branch is attributable to several factors. For instance, "recently Igrunov took the serious political step of proving that he is playing against the Yabloko team." According to Mitrokhin, Igrunov is acting this way because he was deprived of "dictatorial powers" during the recent party reform. He also said that Igrunov and Sharomov had set up a so-called Civil Forum, which was allegedly "an absolutely pro-Kremlin organisation." Moreover, Mitrokhin noted that Sharomov and Igrunov were no doubt implementing the Kremlin's plan of disorganising Yabloko.

In any case, both sides are now waiting for the congress of the party. At the congress members of the party will determine the true layout of forces and the size of each "camp". All leading positions will be redistributed at the congress, and it will be clear which of the party leaders has more supporters: Yavlinsky or Igrunov.

Nezavisimaya Gazeta, September 12, 2001, p. 2

[main page][map of the server][news of the server][forums][guestbook][publications][hot issues]

english@yabloko.ru