Home pageAdvanced searchIndexe-mailAdd to favorites
 

 

AUTUMN OF CHANGES?
By Alexander Romanovsky
Komsomolskaya Pravda,
August 22, 2000, p. 5

Observers and commentators cannot complain that nothing has happened on the eve of the forthcoming political autumn, which promises to be hot. How can we assess the regime's relations with the political elite? After all, the success or failure of the reforms depends to a large extent on their support.

Part of the political elite has backed President Vladimir Putin de facto, as the Kremlin initiated what they had proposed all this time. Grigory Yavlinsky provides a particular illustration of this fact. He was the Kremlin's most staunch opponent throughout Boris Yeltsin's rule. As a result, the regime absolutely ignored all the political and economic models proposed by Yavlinsky who would take the time and effort to adapt them to changing developments all the time. The Kremlin used its resources to transform arguably the most competent team of economists in the country into a team of economic stargazers and romantics in the eyes of the general public.

The reform of the federal structure provides a vivid example. Yavlinsky drew up a "Law on Governors" in 1999. The document stipulated the dismissal of governors from the Federation Council and concentration of their efforts on managing their regions. The document also stated the need to work out a procedure for gubernatorial dismissal, measures for preventing anti-constitutional orders issued by regional leaders, and so on. These are precisely the steps that the Kremlin subsequently proposed.

There is another coincidence in the views of the Yabloko and the Kremlin. This has to do with the formation of a State Council. Yavlinsky objects to giving any constitutional powers to this structure. The president holds the same opinion. Putin is behind the eight ball here: he has to mollify governors to make the proposed State Council as much of a political nonentity as possible. Once again, the federal centre will rely on the Duma to pull it off.

According to Vladimir Lukin of Yabloko, "Russia is not wealthy enough to breed houses of parliament to appease certain dissatisfied individuals..." The Kremlin itself could not have put it better. This is what really counts: Political forces regarded as anti- Kremlin groups in the past now support the federal centre. It does not matter that the regime is doing "what Yavlinsky proposed a long time ago". The regime is doing what it sees as proper and advisable and cannot be blamed for not being the first to come up with the ideas.

Mr. Yavlinsky is not in a hurry to triumphantly claim authorship. In the long run, neither Yabloko on the whole nor he personally has benefited from the situation. On the other hand, quantity will inevitably turn into quality one fine day, and the Yabloko functionaries cannot help expecting to be invited to the corridors of power.

ei Stepashin on Grigory Yavlinsky's proposals