[main page][map of the server][news of the server][forums][guestbook][press-service][hot issues]

On the political crisis in Moscow and the ways out of it

Statement by the Regional Council of the Moscow branch of YABLOKO
September 24, 2010


The situation developing around Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov demonstrates a crisis of the political system created in Russia for the past ten years.

Abolishing direct elections of heads of the regions the federal authorities have virtually eliminated the sole mechanism allowing for a legitimate change of authorities. Certainly this mechanism had its drawbacks, but it functioned nonetheless.

Transfer to virtual appointment of regional heads created a gigantic gap between the authorities and the people, undermined the legitimacy of the heads that were not elected by the citizens [but were appointed by the authorities] and shifted the responsibility for problems and failures in the regions onto the federal centre. Appointment of regional heads has already turned into an arena of under-carpet fight between different clans.

The President of the country in the best traditions of the oligarcharchy unleashed an information war against the Mayor of Moscow at the censored television channels instead of exercising his lawful right of impeaching a governor. The fact that Yuri Luzhkov and his spouse Elena Baturina do not have a possibility to reply on the accusations through the same federal television channels allows us to characterize this campaign as mobbing.

The claims put forward against Luzhkov are quite justified, but they could be set virtually against any regional head, a federal official or a large-scale businessman. Creation by top officials of favourable conditions for businesses based on family ties or friendly relations is an inevitable practice in the oligarchic rule which has developed in Russia since mid 1990s.

This system readily forgives any “liberties” for officials and businessmen until they keep their political loyalty to the top persons of the state. In case of losing such loyalty the system punishes the culprit for the very fact that he has been living in accordance with its laws.

Choosing one of the officials as a victim of mobbing resembles the beginning of persecutions against Mikhail Khodorkovsky who was incriminated the things all the oligarchs of the Yeltsin period did. And the key reason of unleashing such mobbing in both the cases was their personal conflict with the head of the state.

The Moscow regional branch of the YABLOKO party remaining in opposition to the Moscow authorities and stating of the need to change the city authorities, notes that this change should be conducted as follows:
1) it should take place in civilized forms avoiding humiliation of the ex-Mayor and most of the Muscovites who elected him;
2) it should base on the opinion of the Muscovites.

Appointing on the post of the Mayor of Moscow a person who would depend on the Kremlin only and without connection with Muscovites through some responsibility means a way prone of serious social consequences.

We are demanding from the President to return to consideration of YABLOKO’s proposal on restoration of direct elections of regional heads, including the Mayor of Moscow and the Governor of St.Petersburg, the two subjects of the Russian Federation that differ from other regions only in one thing, that their borders coincide with the borders of the cities - Moscow and St.Petersburg.

The new Mayor of Moscow should be chosen through elections, rather than with the help of under-carpet fight of Kremlin’s clans.


Sergei Mitrokhin
Chair of the Moscow YABLOKO branch

 

 


September 24, 2010